8,5,3,3,8,5,7,7,7,7,8,8,7,0

AI-generated creative works that are based on the works of other creators violate intellectual property. / Creative AI tools should not perpetuate bias or limit inclusive representation. / We should limit the negative environmental impact of creative AI tools. 1, I think that although AI-generated works may reference other artistic styles or works, it would be helpful to clearly label which styles or elements of the creator are referenced when generating them, so that copyright disputes can be minimized.AI can generate new works based on already existing ideas, but transparently stating the source of the references is necessary for respecting the fruits of the original author's labor.2, AI should be objective and should not carry any bias. Since AI systems are trained on data from human society, if the data is biased, the AI may also perpetuate those biases. This can affect the diversity and inclusiveness of the performance of the work, so I believe that special attention should be paid to this when creating AI works to ensure that AI-generated content better reflects the plurality of society.3 As far as I know, AI technology requires a large amount of computational resources to operate, which usually consumes a large amount of electricity and water, which in turn has a negative impact on the environment. I believe that when using AI tools, we should consider how to reduce their consumption of the environment, for example, by optimizing the use of computing resources or finding more environmentally friendly ways to run these algorithms.

painting, code, animation,

3-6 years

As a student